Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10500.
Advantages of Core i5-10500
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £176.89 vs £435.39
- Up to 51% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-14900K - £0.70 vs £1.43 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 21% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-10500 - 304 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10500 - 32 vs 12 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
252
83%
Value, £/FPS
£0.7/FPS
100%
Price, £
£176.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £176.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7122 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
304
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.43/FPS
49%
Price, £
£435.39
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for £435.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7121 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10500 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |