Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 6900HX outperforms Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 6900HX is 629 days newer than Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 6900HX
- Performs up to 7% better in Remnant II than Core i5-10400F - 94 vs 88 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Ryzen 9 6900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Rembrandt |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket FP7 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 6 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 680M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
