The Core i5-10400F is a much slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 5900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-10400F
The Ryzen 9 5900 is better in every way
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 5900
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 12 threads
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 9 5900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
187
93%
Min 1% FPS
124
93%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 5900
Jan 12th, 2021
Average FPS
201
100%
Min 1% FPS
133
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 9 5900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 9 5900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 9 5900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Ryzen 9 5900
Jan 12th, 2021
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-10400F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 5900 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 64 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |