In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-10400 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $402 cheaper!
Core i5-10400
- Up to 73% cheaper – $147.00 vs $548.89
- Up to 73% cheaper
- Up to 54% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.88 vs $4.12/FPS
- Up to 54% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Up to 71% faster in Battlefield 6 – 133 vs 78 FPS
- Up to 71% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400 vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
78 FPS
59%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
58%
Price, $
$147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
133 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
100%
Price, $
$548.89
26%
Value, $/FPS
$4.12/FPS
46%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
74%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
