Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Core i5-10300H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 839 days newer than Core i5-10300H.
Advantages of Core i5-10300H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 38% better in Starfield than Core i5-10300H - 80 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10300H - 32 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
80
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.11/FPS
100%
Price, £
£568.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £568.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10300H | vs | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |