Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Core i3-9100F
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - £131.14 vs £929.89
- Up to 83% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 7900X - £0.70 vs £4.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-9100F - 220 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
187
85%
Value, £/FPS
£0.7/FPS
100%
Price, £
£131.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £131.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6830 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.23/FPS
17%
Price, £
£929.89
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for £929.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6830 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100F | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |