Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 926 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Core i3-9100F
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - £131.14 vs £257.02
- Up to 35% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-12900KF - £0.68 vs £1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Rust than Core i3-9100F - 248 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 24 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
194
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.68/FPS
100%
Price, £
£131.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £131.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6840 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
248
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.04/FPS
65%
Price, £
£257.02
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for £257.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6839 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100F | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |