The Core i3-9100F is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-3220T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-9100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Advantages of the Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i3-9100F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i3-9100F vs Core i3-3220T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, £
£116.66
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.62/FPS
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
90%
Min 1% FPS
112
91%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-9100F vs Core i3-3220T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100F vs Core i3-3220T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100F vs Core i3-3220T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-9100F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-3220T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
