Core i3-8300 vs Core i3-10105F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-8300 is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-8300
- Consumes up to 5% less energy – 62 vs 65 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-8300
Feb 14th, 2018
Average FPS
201
99%
Min 1% FPS
138
99%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
204
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8300 vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8300 vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8300
Feb 14th, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8300 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $138.00 | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
62 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
