Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Core i3-8100
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - £130.50 vs £307.67
- Up to 50% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-13700K - £1.01 vs £2.00 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-8100 - 154 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
129
84%
Value, £/FPS
£1.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£130.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £130.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Buy for £307.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-8100 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |