Buy on Amazon
£552.48
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $449
Availability
MSRP $449
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 2192 days newer than Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Core i3-7350K
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 60 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 77% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-7350K - 94 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 16 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
94
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.88/FPS
100%
Price, £
£552.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D CPU AM5 4.2GHz (5.0 Turbo) 8-Core 120W 104MB Cache 5nm 7th Gen Radeon Graphics NO HEATSINK/FAN - 100-100000910WOF
Buy for £552.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7350K | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 42.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
PCs Using Core i3-7350K or Ryzen 7 7800X3D
With selected game settings
50 FPS
£39/FPS
32 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
£1,949.94
In Stock
58 FPS
£29.31/FPS
64 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
£1,699.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
