Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Core i3-7300T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2093 days newer than Core i3-7300T.
Advantages of Core i3-7300T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 12% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-7300T - 134 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300T - 20 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.71/FPS
100%
Price, £
£229.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £229.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7300T | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |