Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 2561 days newer than Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Core i3-7300
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 20% better in Starfield than Core i3-7300 - 67 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
67
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.58/FPS
100%
Price, £
£239.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £239.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7300 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |