Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Core i3-7100
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700 - £53.82 vs £126.47
- Up to 54% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 5700 - £0.29 vs £0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-7100 - 200 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
184
92%
Value, £/FPS
£0.29/FPS
100%
Price, £
£53.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £53.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 307 minutes ago
Buy for £126.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 306 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7100 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |