Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2478 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Core i3-7100
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £53.77 vs £435.39
- Up to 87% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-14900K - £0.20 vs £1.51 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Core i3-7100 - 289 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 32 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £53.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 780 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.51/FPS
13%
Price, £
£435.39
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for £435.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 779 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7100 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |