Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 4085 days newer than Core i3-560.
Advantages of Core i3-560
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 73 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 28% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-560 - 474 vs 370 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
474
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.69/FPS
100%
Price, £
£325.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £325.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-560 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |