The Core i3-560 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-9100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-560
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i3-9100F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i3-9100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 65 vs 73 Watts
Core i3-560 vs Core i3-9100F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-560
Aug 29th, 2010
Average FPS
167
90%
Min 1% FPS
112
91%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, £
£116.66
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.62/FPS
100%
Core i3-560 vs Core i3-9100F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-560 vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-560 vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-560
Aug 29th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.33 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
56%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-560 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $138.00 | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| 73 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
