In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-4330 is slightly slower than the Core i3-10100 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $10 more expensive!
Core i3-4330
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core i3-10100
- Up to 14% faster in Battlefield 6 – 75 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 6% cheaper – $159.99 vs $169.95
- Up to 6% cheaper
- Up to 17% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.13 vs $2.57/FPS
- Up to 17% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4330 vs Core i3-10100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
66 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
49 FPS
88%
Price, $
$169.95
94%
Value, $/FPS
$2.57/FPS
83%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
75 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
56 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4330 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
54W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
