Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i3-4170T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1560 days newer than Core i3-4170T.
Advantages of Core i3-4170T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4170T - 192 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170T - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
192
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.85/FPS
100%
Price, £
£354.25
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £354.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 30th, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4170T | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |