Core i3-4170 vs Core i9-11900F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-4170 is at least much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-11900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-4170
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-11900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
196
88%
Min 1% FPS
135
89%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-11900F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
223
100%
Min 1% FPS
152
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i9-11900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Core i9-11900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
50%
Core i9-11900F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $422.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
