The Core i3-4010U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-4010U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-13900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Core i3-4010U vs Core i9-13900F
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-4010U
Jun 4th, 2013
Average FPS
183
77%
Min 1% FPS
127
79%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
237
100%
Min 1% FPS
161
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4010U vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4010U vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4010U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-4010U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake-S |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
