Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2057 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 37 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-4000M - 124 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-4000M
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4000M | vs | Core i9-9900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
