In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-380M is much slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Up to 156% faster in Battlefield 6 – 159 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 156% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 26, 2010
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-380M vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-380M vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-380M vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-380M
Oct 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
2%
Base Frequency
2.534 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-380M Oct 26th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7950X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $699.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | AM5 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
