Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 5114 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 161% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-350M - 558 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 28 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
558
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.56/FPS
100%
Price, £
£311.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £311.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-350M | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |