Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4745 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 26% better in Remnant II than Core i3-350M - 97 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 16 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-350M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-350M | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
