The Core i3-3250 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 7700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 7700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Core i3-3250 vs Ryzen 7 7700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-3250
Jun 9th, 2013
Average FPS
169
78%
Min 1% FPS
114
80%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 7 7700
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
218
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, £
£356.83
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.63/FPS
100%
Core i3-3250 vs Ryzen 7 7700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3250 vs Ryzen 7 7700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3250 vs Ryzen 7 7700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3250
Jun 9th, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
31%
Ryzen 7 7700
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-3250 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
$138.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 32 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR5 @ 5200 MHz |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
