Core i3-3225 vs Core i5-9600KF in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-3225 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-9600KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-3225
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 55 vs 95 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i5-9600KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
183
89%
Min 1% FPS
127
90%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
206
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i5-9600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i5-9600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3225 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
