Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2985 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Core i3-3220
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - £16.26 vs £295.00
- Up to 94% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen 9 5950X - £0.07 vs £1.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 21% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-3220 - 273 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 32 vs 4 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
225
82%
Value, £/FPS
£0.07/FPS
100%
Price, £
£16.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £16.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Buy for £295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |