Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4061 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Core i3-3220
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £16.26 vs £433.50
- Up to 96% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i9-14900K - £0.10 vs £2.29 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i3-3220 - 189 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 32 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for £16.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
Buy for £433.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |