Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Core i3-3220
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - £16.26 vs £74.97
- Up to 64% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-14100F - £0.36 vs £0.99 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 69% better in Starfield than Core i3-3220 - 76 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £16.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8662 minutes ago
Buy for £74.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8662 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220 | vs | Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |