The Core i3-3217U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 17 vs 125 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-13900KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-13900KF
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
178
74%
Min 1% FPS
124
76%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
241
100%
Min 1% FPS
164
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-3217U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake-S |
17 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.8 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
