In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-3217U is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-10700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 17 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 40% faster in Battlefield 6 – 87 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 40% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 7 years and 10 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3217U vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
87 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
65 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.37/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3217U vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1200 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
