Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 3229 days newer than Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 31% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3210 - 152 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
152
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.57/FPS
100%
Price, £
£238.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £238.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 263 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3210 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |