In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-2350M is slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 1200. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-2350M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 3 1200
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6 – 67 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer – Jul 27, 2017 vs Oct 01, 2011
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-2350M vs Ryzen 3 1200: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 3 1200
Jul 27th, 2017
Average FPS
67 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2350M vs Ryzen 3 1200 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2350M vs Ryzen 3 1200 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2350M
Oct 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 3 1200
Jul 27th, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2350M Oct 1st, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 1200 Jul 27th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 1st, 2011 | Released | Jul 27th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM4 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
