Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4336 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120.
Advantages of Core i3-2120
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £152.86 vs £639.99
- Up to 70% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £0.56 vs £1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 25% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-2120 - 342 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 32 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
274
80%
Value, £/FPS
£0.56/FPS
100%
Price, £
£152.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £152.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
342
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.87/FPS
30%
Price, £
£639.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for £639.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-2120 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |