Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-14100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-14100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 83 days older than the cheaper Core i3-14100F.
Advantages of Core i3-14100F
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £75.97 vs £433.50
- Up to 81% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-14900K - £0.24 vs £1.28 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-14100F - 339 vs 321 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
321
95%
Value, £/FPS
£0.24/FPS
100%
Price, £
£75.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £75.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
339
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.28/FPS
19%
Price, £
£433.5
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for £433.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-14100F | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |