Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-14100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-14100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 83 days older than the cheaper Core i3-14100F.
Advantages of Core i3-14100F
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - £74.97 vs £326.15
- Up to 77% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-14700KF - £0.45 vs £1.94 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-14100F - 168 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 28 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
166
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.45/FPS
100%
Price, £
£74.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £74.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7259 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
168
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.94/FPS
23%
Price, £
£326.15
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for £326.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7259 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-14100F | vs | Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |