Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-14100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-14100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 468 days older than the cheaper Core i3-14100.
Advantages of Core i3-14100
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - £110.96 vs £267.90
- Up to 58% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-13600K - £0.76 vs £1.81 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-14100 - 148 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100 - 20 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
146
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.76/FPS
100%
Price, £
£110.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £110.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
148
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.81/FPS
42%
Price, £
£267.9
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for £267.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 825 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-14100 | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |