Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-13100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-13100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 369 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-13100F.
Advantages of Core i3-13100F
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - £71.97 vs £311.37
- Up to 73% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-14700F - £0.15 vs £0.56 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 15% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-13100F - 558 vs 486 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 28 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
486
87%
Value, £/FPS
£0.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£71.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £71.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
558
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.56/FPS
27%
Price, £
£311.37
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for £311.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-13100F | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |