The Core i3-10325 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-11900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-10325
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-11900K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
Core i3-10325 vs Core i9-11900K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10325
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
192
93%
Min 1% FPS
127
93%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
207
100%
Min 1% FPS
136
100%
Price, £
£333.63
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.61/FPS
100%
Core i3-10325 vs Core i9-11900K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10325 vs Core i9-11900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10325 vs Core i9-11900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10325
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10325 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$154.00 | MSRP | $539.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |