The Core i3-10320 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-13100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-10320
The Core i3-13100 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i3-13100
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 60 vs 65 Watts
Core i3-10320 vs Core i3-13100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
189
93%
Min 1% FPS
125
93%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i3-13100
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
204
100%
Min 1% FPS
135
100%
Price, £
£110.97
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.54/FPS
100%
Core i3-10320 vs Core i3-13100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10320 vs Core i3-13100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10320 vs Core i3-13100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i3-13100
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
98%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10320 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-13100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
