Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - £75.95 vs £570.81
- Up to 84% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i9-14900 - £0.43 vs £2.68 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 21% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i3-10105F - 213 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
83%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£75.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £75.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8620 minutes ago
Buy for £570.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8620 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |