Core i3-10105F vs Core i9-13900KF in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-10105F is at least much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-13900KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
204
85%
Min 1% FPS
140
85%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
241
100%
Min 1% FPS
164
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105F vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
76%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105F | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$97.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
