The Core i3-10105 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4130, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's £87.69 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-10105
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 84% cheaper – £16.87 vs £104.56
- A better value for money for gaming
Core i3-10105 vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, £
£104.56
16%
Value, £/FPS
£0.55/FPS
18%
Core i3-10105 vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10105 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
