Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Celeron G6900E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 61 days older than Celeron G6900E.
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G6900E - 155 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900E - 24 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
155
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.11/FPS
100%
Price, £
£327.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £327.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900E | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |