In Battlefield 6, the Celeron G6900 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 3 3100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G6900
- Up to 1% faster in Battlefield 6 – 79 vs 78 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Apr 24, 2020
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 46 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 29% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 3 3100
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen 3 3100: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 3 3100
Apr 24th, 2020
Average FPS
78 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen 3 3100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen 3 3100 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3100
Apr 24th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 3100 Apr 24th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Released | Apr 24th, 2020 |
$52.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM4 |
46 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
