The Celeron G5900 is a much faster gaming CPU than the FX-8300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron G5900
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 58 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron G5900 vs FX-8300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G5900
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
115
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G5900 vs FX-8300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G5900 vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G5900 vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G5900
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G5900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
58 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD 610 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
