Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 2106 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - £59.75 vs £239.56
- Up to 71% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - £0.50 vs £1.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 18% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G4900 - 140 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
119
85%
Value, £/FPS
£0.5/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7497 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
140
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.71/FPS
29%
Price, £
£239.56
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for £239.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7497 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |