The Celeron G4900 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 2200G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 2200G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron G4900 vs Ryzen 3 2200G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
170
96%
Min 1% FPS
114
97%
Price, £
£59.75
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.35/FPS
100%
Ryzen 3 2200G
Feb 12th, 2018
Average FPS
178
100%
Min 1% FPS
118
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G4900 vs Ryzen 3 2200G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G4900 vs Ryzen 3 2200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G4900 vs Ryzen 3 2200G in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Ryzen 3 2200G
Feb 12th, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G4900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
$42.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
