The Celeron G3920 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-11700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron G3920
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-11700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 2 threads
Celeron G3920 vs Core i7-11700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G3920
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
170
85%
Min 1% FPS
114
86%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i7-11700
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
201
100%
Min 1% FPS
133
100%
Price, £
£401.35
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.99/FPS
100%
Celeron G3920 vs Core i7-11700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3920 vs Core i7-11700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3920 vs Core i7-11700 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3920
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Core i7-11700
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G3920 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-11700 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Not Available | MSRP | $323.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
51 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 GHz |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |